[yocto] Yocto layers missing thud branches

hi,

while we are there.. in our builds we use the following layers which also
need the 'thud' branches:

name="OSSystems/meta-browser" path="layers/meta-browser"
name="git/meta-ti" path="layers/meta-ti" remote="yocto"
name="kraj/meta-clang" path="layers/meta-clang"
name="meta-rust/meta-rust" path="layers/meta-rust"

thanks!
nico

Post by akuster808
Can the maintainers of meta-qt3, meta-qt4, meta-selinux, and meta-cgl
please add a "Thud" branch
kind regards,
Armin
--
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Max Krummenacher

2018-11-18 11:11:35 UTC

Post by akuster808
Can the maintainers of meta-qt3, meta-qt4, meta-selinux, and meta-cgl
please add a "Thud" branch

While at it, the following patches declaring thud compatibility are not
yet applied:
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042780.html
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042922.html
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042923.html

Thanks.
Max
--

Paul Eggleton

2018-11-18 20:47:30 UTC

Post by akuster808
Can the maintainers of meta-qt3, meta-qt4, meta-selinux, and meta-cgl
please add a "Thud" branch

While at it, the following patches declaring thud compatibility are not
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042780.html
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042922.html
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042923.html

I have just taken care of meta-qt3 and meta-qt4, FWIW.

Cheers,
Paul

--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre

--

akuster808

2018-11-18 21:11:15 UTC

Post by akuster808
Can the maintainers of meta-qt3, meta-qt4, meta-selinux, and meta-cgl
please add a "Thud" branch

I have just taken care of meta-qt3 and meta-qt4, FWIW.

Thanks Paul.

Post by Paul Eggleton
Cheers,
Paul

Richard Purdie

2018-11-20 23:05:21 UTC

Post by akuster808
Can the maintainers of meta-qt3, meta-qt4, meta-selinux, and meta-cgl
please add a "Thud" branch

While at it, the following patches declaring thud compatibility are not

https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042780.html
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042922.html
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042923.html

Post by Paul Eggleton
I have just taken care of meta-qt3 and meta-qt4, FWIW.

Given we don't test those any more, should we be pushing these new
branches?

Cheers,

Richard

--

akuster808

2018-11-20 23:21:34 UTC

Post by akuster808
Can the maintainers of meta-qt3, meta-qt4, meta-selinux, and meta-cgl
please add a "Thud" branch

While at it, the following patches declaring thud compatibility are not

Post by Paul Eggleton
I have just taken care of meta-qt3 and meta-qt4, FWIW.

Given we don't test those any more, should we be pushing these new
branches?

Are the branching schemes in sync with what we test , build or both? I
think we should be clear what is built or built and tested if there are
exception.

The 2.6 release notes called out so it may lead to the conclusion its
tested.

Release Name: meta-qt3-thud-20.0.0
Branch: thud
Tag: thud-20.0.0
Hash: 02f273cba6c25f5cf20cb66d8a417a83772c3179
md5: 7b73bf1132428ea898938b03815cad21

- armin

Post by Max Krummenacher
Cheers,
Richard

r***@linuxfoundation.org

2018-11-20 23:55:34 UTC

Post by akuster808

Post by akuster808
Can the maintainers of meta-qt3, meta-qt4, meta-selinux, and meta-cgl
please add a "Thud" branch

While at it, the following patches declaring thud compatibility are not

Post by Paul Eggleton
I have just taken care of meta-qt3 and meta-qt4, FWIW.

Given we don't test those any more, should we be pushing these new
branches?

Are the branching schemes in sync with what we test , build or both?
I think we should be clear what is built or built and tested if there
are exception.
The 2.6 release notes called out so it may lead to the conclusion its
tested.
Release Name: meta-qt3-thud-20.0.0
Branch: thud
Tag: thud-20.0.0
Hash: 02f273cba6c25f5cf20cb66d8a417a83772c3179
md5: 7b73bf1132428ea898938b03815cad21

Scripts may have put that in the release notes and even done tagging
but I'm fairly sure it doesn't get built or tested...

I think processes are being followed without review. Yes, I probably
should have caught this before now but I'm not alone in that :(.

Cheers,

Richard

--

Matthias Schoepfer

2018-11-22 15:10:29 UTC

Hi there,

seems like meta-java also missing a thud branch?!

git://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-java

Regards,

Â Â Matthias

Post by akuster808
Can the maintainers of meta-qt3, meta-qt4, meta-selinux, and meta-cgl
please add a "Thud" branch
kind regards,
Armin

Stephen Lawrence

2018-11-22 16:42:07 UTC