Discussion:
Yocto layers missing thud branches
(too old to reply)
akuster808
2018-11-17 23:50:18 UTC
Permalink
Can the maintainers of meta-qt3, meta-qt4, meta-selinux, and meta-cgl
please add a "Thud" branch

kind regards,
Armin
--
Nicolas Dechesne
2018-11-17 23:53:27 UTC
Permalink
hi,

while we are there.. in our builds we use the following layers which also
need the 'thud' branches:

name="OSSystems/meta-browser" path="layers/meta-browser"
name="git/meta-ti" path="layers/meta-ti" remote="yocto"
name="kraj/meta-clang" path="layers/meta-clang"
name="meta-rust/meta-rust" path="layers/meta-rust"

thanks!
nico
Post by akuster808
Can the maintainers of meta-qt3, meta-qt4, meta-selinux, and meta-cgl
please add a "Thud" branch
kind regards,
Armin
--
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
Max Krummenacher
2018-11-18 11:11:35 UTC
Permalink
Hi
Post by akuster808
Can the maintainers of meta-qt3, meta-qt4, meta-selinux, and meta-cgl
please add a "Thud" branch
While at it, the following patches declaring thud compatibility are not
yet applied:
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042780.html
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042922.html
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042923.html

Thanks.
Max
--
Paul Eggleton
2018-11-18 20:47:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Max Krummenacher
Post by akuster808
Can the maintainers of meta-qt3, meta-qt4, meta-selinux, and meta-cgl
please add a "Thud" branch
While at it, the following patches declaring thud compatibility are not
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042780.html
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042922.html
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042923.html
I have just taken care of meta-qt3 and meta-qt4, FWIW.

Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre


--
akuster808
2018-11-18 21:11:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Paul Eggleton
Post by Max Krummenacher
Post by akuster808
Can the maintainers of meta-qt3, meta-qt4, meta-selinux, and meta-cgl
please add a "Thud" branch
While at it, the following patches declaring thud compatibility are not
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042780.html
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042922.html
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042923.html
I have just taken care of meta-qt3 and meta-qt4, FWIW.
Thanks Paul.
Post by Paul Eggleton
Cheers,
Paul
--
Richard Purdie
2018-11-20 23:05:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Paul Eggleton
Post by Max Krummenacher
Post by akuster808
Can the maintainers of meta-qt3, meta-qt4, meta-selinux, and meta-cgl
please add a "Thud" branch
While at it, the following patches declaring thud compatibility are not
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042780.html
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042922.html
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042923.html
Post by Paul Eggleton
I have just taken care of meta-qt3 and meta-qt4, FWIW.
Given we don't test those any more, should we be pushing these new
branches?

Cheers,

Richard

--
akuster808
2018-11-20 23:21:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by Max Krummenacher
Post by Paul Eggleton
Post by Max Krummenacher
Post by akuster808
Can the maintainers of meta-qt3, meta-qt4, meta-selinux, and meta-cgl
please add a "Thud" branch
While at it, the following patches declaring thud compatibility are not
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042780.html
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042922.html
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042923.html
Post by Paul Eggleton
I have just taken care of meta-qt3 and meta-qt4, FWIW.
Given we don't test those any more, should we be pushing these new
branches?
Are the branching schemes in sync with what we test , build or both?  I
think we should be clear what is built or built and tested if there are
exception.


The 2.6 release notes called out so it may lead to the conclusion its
tested.

Release Name: meta-qt3-thud-20.0.0
Branch: thud
Tag: thud-20.0.0
Hash: 02f273cba6c25f5cf20cb66d8a417a83772c3179
md5: 7b73bf1132428ea898938b03815cad21

- armin
Post by Max Krummenacher
Cheers,
Richard
--
r***@linuxfoundation.org
2018-11-20 23:55:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by akuster808
Post by Max Krummenacher
Post by Paul Eggleton
Post by Max Krummenacher
Post by akuster808
Can the maintainers of meta-qt3, meta-qt4, meta-selinux, and meta-cgl
please add a "Thud" branch
While at it, the following patches declaring thud compatibility are not
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042780.html
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042922.html
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042923.html
Post by Paul Eggleton
I have just taken care of meta-qt3 and meta-qt4, FWIW.
Given we don't test those any more, should we be pushing these new
branches?
Are the branching schemes in sync with what we test , build or both?
I think we should be clear what is built or built and tested if there
are exception.
The 2.6 release notes called out so it may lead to the conclusion its
tested.
Release Name: meta-qt3-thud-20.0.0
Branch: thud
Tag: thud-20.0.0
Hash: 02f273cba6c25f5cf20cb66d8a417a83772c3179
md5: 7b73bf1132428ea898938b03815cad21
Scripts may have put that in the release notes and even done tagging
but I'm fairly sure it doesn't get built or tested...

I think processes are being followed without review. Yes, I probably
should have caught this before now but I'm not alone in that :(.

Cheers,

Richard


--
Matthias Schoepfer
2018-11-22 15:10:29 UTC
Permalink
Hi there,

seems like meta-java also missing a thud branch?!

git://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-java

Regards,

   Matthias
Post by akuster808
Can the maintainers of meta-qt3, meta-qt4, meta-selinux, and meta-cgl
please add a "Thud" branch
kind regards,
Armin
Stephen Lawrence
2018-11-22 16:42:07 UTC
Permalink
-----Original Message-----
Of akuster808
Sent: 17 November 2018 23:50
Subject: [yocto] Yocto layers missing thud branches
Can the maintainers of meta-qt3, meta-qt4, meta-selinux, and meta-cgl
please add a "Thud" branch
kind regards,
Armin
Anyone looking for Thud support for the automotive IVI layer meta-ivi [1]
can find it on the master branch. That is the working branch ahead of the next
major meta-ivi release early next year, which will be based on Thud.

[1] https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-ivi/

Regards

Steve
--

Loading...